Teaching strategy based on mnemonics to master technical-scientific language and improve scientific culture in natural sciences
Keywords:
Mnemonics, technical-scientific language, basic education, natural sciences, scientific cultureAbstract
The mastery of technical-scientific language is essential for elementary school students to develop accurate and effective communication skills, fundamental for their academic and professional success in the scientific and technological fields. In the subject of Natural Sciences, the adequate use of this language facilitates the understanding and communication of complex concepts, fosters critical thinking, and allows for a detailed interpretation of natural phenomena. However, students face difficulties due to the abstraction and specificity of the scientific-technical vocabulary, which can lead to confusion and discouragement. In response to these difficulties, the present study, a quasi-experimental study with a mixed approach, evaluated the effectiveness of a didactic strategy based on mnemonics to improve the mastery of technical-scientific language and scientific culture in students in the sixth year of General Basic Education (EGB) at the Prof. Jorge Amable Quezada Pinzón Educational Unit. The sample consisted of 11 students and 2 teachers. Through questionnaires, direct observation and semi-structured interviews, the mnemonic strategy was implemented and evaluated, which included the creation of acronyms, rhymes, and visual associations. The results showed significant improvements in the comprehension of scientific terms, inquiry skills, and application of scientific knowledge, confirming the effectiveness of mnemonic strategies in the educational context. These findings underscore the importance of integrating mnemonic techniques to overcome barriers in the learning of scientific vocabulary and to promote deeper and longer-lasting understanding.
Downloads
References
Agbowuro, C., Taiwo, O. L., Mamfa, J. P., & Usman, I. S. (2016). Application of mnemonics in science education. Journal of Resourcefulness and Distinction, 12(1), 112-123.
Argüelles Pascual, V., Hernández Rodríguez, A. A., & H. Palacios, R. (2021). Métodos empíricos de la investigación. Ciencia Huasteca Boletín Científico De La Escuela Superior De Huejutla, 9(17), 33-34. https://doi.org/10.29057/esh.v9i17.6701
Curran, M. (2020). Complex Sentences in an Elementary Science Curriculum: A research note. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_lshss-19-00064
De los Santos Armenta, P. (2024). Mnemotécnica,“El arte de memorizar” en los estudiantes de la asignatura de inglés nivel medio superior. Latam: revista latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 5(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i2.1921
Gamboa Rojas, M. (2016). Diseño de módulos didácticos-lúdicos para la enseñanza de sistemas mecánicos en centros interactivos de ciencia. (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad de Zaragoza.
Helman, A., Dennis, M. S., & Kern, L. (2022). Clues: Using generative strategies to improve the science vocabulary of secondary English learners with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720929005
Hoffman, M. (2020). MATEMÁTICAS Fórmulas, reglas y reglas mnemotécnicas. Marcombo.
Khalilova, K. (2023). Academic vocabulary: how to teach and study it. Modern Science and Research, 2(9), 79–83. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/23902
Martínez López, A. (2023). La entrevista en profundidad y la observación directa: observaciones cualitativas para un enfoque holístico. Caminos de utopía: Las ciencias sociales en las nuevas sociedades inteligentes, 1(33), 739-749.
Mazo, L., & De Arce, L. (2022). La nemotecnia como estrategia pedagógica para el aprendizaje de la tabla periódica. Revista Estudios Psicológicos, 2(1), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rep.2022.01.009
Mönch, C., & Markic, S. (2022). Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Scientific Language Knowledge—A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 12(7), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070497
Orozco Alvarado, J. C., & Díaz Pérez, A. A. (2018). ¿Cómo redactar los antecedentes de una investigación cualitativa?. Revista Electrónica De Conocimientos, Saberes Y Prácticas, 1(2), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.30698/recsp.v1i2.13
Peñafiel Cegido, L. S., & Castro Molina, N. E. (2019). Estrategias Mnemotécnicas para el aprendizaje del vocabulario en el idioma inglés. Pro Sciences: Revista De Producción, Ciencias E Investigación, 3(29), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.29018/issn.2588-1000vol3iss29.2019pp20-28
Piza Burgos, N. D., Amaiquema Márquez, F. A., & Beltrán Baquerizo, G. E. (2019). Métodos y técnicas en la investigación cualitativa. Algunas precisiones necesarias. Conrado, 15(70), 455-459. https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/1162
Ramírez Ríos, A., & Polack Peña, A. M. (2020). Estadística inferencial. Elección de una prueba estadística no paramétrica en investigación científica. Horizonte de la Ciencia, 10(19), 191-208. https://revistas.uncp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontedelaciencia/article/view/597
Tekindur, A., & Kingir, S. (2023). Improving Elementary Students’ Science Achievement, Inquiry and Scientific Writing Skills through Argument-Based Inquiry. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2286965
Williams, J. (2019). The nature of science in science education: a case study of the development of the nature of science in the National Curriculum for science 1988 – 2010. (Tesis doctoral). University of Sussex.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
© Podrá reproducirse, de forma parcial o total, el contenido de esta publicación, siempre que se haga de forma literal y se mencione la fuente.
