Management indicators in Ecuadorian universities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62697/rmiie.v4i2.182

Keywords:

Management indicators, higher education, university efficiency, accreditation, public policies

Abstract

The article critically analyzes the management indicators implemented in Ecuadorian universities between 2010 and 2024, evaluating their design, impact and limitations. Through a mixed approach (qualitative-quantitative), data from CACES, SENESCYT and SNIESE were examined, complemented with case studies in three universities (ESPOL, USFQ, UCE). The results revealed that only 15.6% of the institutions are efficient according to DEA analysis, with an average technical inefficiency of 34%. In addition, a significant gap in research productivity between public and private universities was identified (0.5 vs. 2.1 Scopus publications per faculty member/year). Interviews with key actors highlighted problems such as the homogenization of indicators, excessive bureaucratization and incentives for publications in predatory journals. The authors propose a new typology of indicators that integrates qualitative dimensions, such as social impact and administrative efficiency, to overcome the limitations of the current model, which prioritizes quantitative metrics without considering local contexts or diverse institutional missions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Paola Razo-Delgado, Universidad Bolivariana. Ecuador.

 

 

References

Arcos Portero, A. P. (2018). El costo oculto de la educación superior. Un estudio comparativo a los gastos realizados por estudiantes de universidades públicas y privadas de la provincia de Tungurahua. UTC Prospectivas: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Económicas, 1(2), 29-52. https://investigacion.utc.edu.ec/index.php/prospectivasutc/article/view/172/838

Borroto Cruz, E., Torrens Pérez, M. E., Rondón Sierra, R. (2021). Calidad Editorial versus Editoriales Depredadoras Telos, 23(2). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=99366775016

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2010). Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior. Registro Oficial Suplemento 298. https://www.ces.gob.ec/documentos/Normativa/LOES.pdf

Gamboa Poveda, J. E. (2016). La planificación financiera y la mejora de la gestión administrativa en las Facultades de las Universidades Públicas: caso Universidad Estatal de Milagro - Ecuador. Revista Publicando, 3(8), 390-408. https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/309

Lema Balla, J. C., Valdivieso Caraguay, G. P., Allauca Peñafiel, D. R., Pilalumbo Choloquinga, E. R., & Lema Balla, J. R. (2024). Retos de la Educación Superior en el Contexto Ecuatoriano. Desafíos de la Investigación Cualitativa. Métodos, Técnicas y Análisis de Datos. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(4), 9806-9824. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.13131

Marginson, S. (2020). Global trends in higher education quality assurance. Brill.

Ordorika, I., (2015). Rankings universitarios. Revista de la Educación Superior, 44(173), 7-9. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/604/60436859001.pdf

Peñate Santana, Y. P. (2016). Análisis envolvente de datos (DEA): una alternativa viable para la evaluación de la eficiencia en universidades ecuatorianas. Estrategia y Gestión Universitaria, 4(2), 25-41. https://revistas.unica.cu/index.php/regu/article/view/421

Téllez Silva, J. M., Gómez Demetrio, W., & Herrera Tapia, F. (2022). Un método para valorar la inclusión comunitaria en programas sociales. Inter disciplina, 10(26), 315-339. https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/inter/article/view/80981

Published

2025-05-01

How to Cite

Coello-Arias, W. L., Napa-Arévalo, L., Razo-Delgado, P., & Zúñiga-Delgado, M. S. (2025). Management indicators in Ecuadorian universities. Revista Mexicana De Investigación E Intervención Educativa, 4(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.62697/rmiie.v4i2.182