Legal literacy as a condition for access to justice in secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62697/rmiie.v5i2.322Keywords:
Legal literacy, socio-legal studies, civic education, youth legal consciousnessAbstract
This article analyzes the insufficient presence of legal literacy content in Ecuadorian secondary education as a factor affecting young people’s real capacity to exercise their rights. A qualitative socio-legal approach is adopted, based on a case study of a secondary school located in northern Ecuador. The study examines the curricular design, educational guidelines, and the discourses of institutional actors, as well as students’ perceptions regarding their knowledge of the law and their understanding of basic legal procedures. Through thematic analysis of interviews and documentary review of the official curriculum, the research identifies a persistent tendency to equate civic education with legal education. This approach results in instruction focused primarily on democratic values and general principles, while lacking concrete procedural orientation. Such a framework leads to limited preparation to recognize rights violations and to activate institutional mechanisms for protection. It is argued that the absence of systematic legal instruction at the secondary level contributes to maintaining informational inequalities that affect students’ legal empowerment and shape their relationship with the justice system. In this way, the article contributes to the academic discussion on youth legal consciousness and education as a crucial space for strengthening the effective exercise of citizenship within the Latin American context.
Downloads
References
Aguiar Aguilar, A. A. (2021). Gaining access to justice: A subnational study of the public defender’s office in Mexico. Mexican Law Review, 13(2), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2021.2.15089
Arias Sinchi, M., Mansutti Rodríguez, A., Loaiza Sánchez, K., & López, M. (2024). Formación del docente para el sistema educativo ecuatoriano del siglo XXI. Boletín ObservaUNAE, 1–65. https://revistas.unae.edu.ec/index.php/observaUNAE/article/view/boletin-8
Guerrero Meza, N., & Reyes Mauricio, E. S. (2025). Educación para la ciudadanía global: Un estudio sobre la integración de temas de interculturalidad y derechos humanos en la currícula escolar. Innovarium International Journal, 3(1), 1–14. https://revinde.org/index.php/innovarium/article/view/27/28
Jiménez Pérez, E., León Urrutia, M., Caldevilla Domínguez, D., & Arlandis López, S. (2025). ¿Quién entiende la ley? Vocabulario legal como predictor de la competencia ciudadana. Investigaciones Sobre Lectura, 20(2), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.24310/isl.20.2.2025.22845
Malona, S., Besedina, I., Prylypko, V., & Ostashova, V. (2023). The role of legal education in shaping the legal culture of the future: Strategies and prospects for development. Futurity Education, 3(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.09.25.15
Mellado Moreno, P. C., & Burgos, C. (2025). Didactics in social studies for global citizenship education: Dimensions and technological contexts. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1514027. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1514027
Pereira, G. (2022). Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(2), 696–732. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac044
Prado Prado, G., Duarte Hidalgo, C., Cardozo Pozo, R., & Moscoso Jorquera, P. (2025). Percepción de los derechos humanos en la formación jurídica: El caso de la carrera de derecho de la Universidad de Atacama. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Valparaíso), 86, 359–398. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/rcs/n86/0719-8442-rcs-86-359.pdf
Rojas-Estrada, E. G., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2025). Perception of civil society on the curricular integration of media competence: Challenges and opportunities in Latin America. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 36(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00710-2
Toapanta Fuel, T. A., Sevillano Monteros, W. P., Angulo Terán , E. G., & Suconota Chillogalli, M. V. (2025). La educación y los derechos humanos en Ecuador. Educational Regent Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.63969/q180w290
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christian Andress Rueda-Aguilar, Carmen Marina Méndez-Cabrita, Diego Fernando Coka-Flores, Alvaro Henrry Tulcanaza-Guapaz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Investigación e Intervención Educativa (RMIIE), of Universidad Pablo Latapí Sarre agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.






