Articulating axes and educational psychology: an intervention experience in a rural primary school in Hidalgo

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62697/rmiie.v5i4.449

Keywords:

Educational psychology, articulating axes, rural primary, neurodivergence, inclusive practices

Abstract

The contribution of the area of educational psychology in the school consists of, among other activities; guide the family, follow up on the current Curriculum and Programs through actions that identify, minimize and eliminate barriers to learning and participation of neurodivergent students either with disabilities or outstanding aptitudes and the training of teachers for the implementation of reasonable adjustments in didactic planning, that translate into visible actions of inclusive and quality education. This study was based on the delivery of seven intervention strategies to strengthen the implementation of the articulating axes, analyzing the relationship from the context of a rural elementary school in the state of Hidalgo and the role of a special education psychologist. To this end, a mixed approach was adopted with documentary analysis, the application of surveys, semi-structured interviews with teachers, principals, and mothers. The results show that a greater articulation between educational psychology and the teaching collective favors inclusive and socio-emotional practices, according to the guidelines and challenges of the New Mexican School. It should also be considered that there are still limitations related to the availability of human resources, teacher training, and interdisciplinary coordination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonso Carmona, C., García-Arnau, A., & Vázquez-Cupeiro, S. (2023). ¿Qué es la desigualdad educativa? Divergencias y continuidades en las grandes reformas educativas en España. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.8021

Barraza López, R. (2015). Perspectivas acerca del rol del psicólogo educacional: Propuesta orientadora de su actuación en el ámbito escolar. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 15(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v15i3.21070

Corral, E., Villalobos, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2024). The role of ideas in a counter-cultural education reform: The case of Chilean inclusion law. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.11270

Figueroa-Céspedes, I., Ossa-Cornejo, C., & Jorquera-Martínez, C. (2020). El psicólogo educacional como amigo crítico: Aportes y posibilidades para el cambio y mejora escolar. Límite, 15(5). https://revistalimite.uta.cl/index.php/limite/article/view/122

Gaitas, S., Pipa, J., & Botelho, M. (2025). Inclusive horizons: School psychologists’ efficacy profiles in inclusive education. School Psychology International, 46(4), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343241312903

Hardy, I., Heikkinen, H., Pennanen, M., Salo, P., & Kiilakoski, T. (2021). The ‘spirit of the times’: Fast policy for educational reform in Finland. Policy Futures in Education, 19(7), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320971530

Messiou, K., & Ainscow, M. (2021). Inclusive inquiry: An innovative approach for promoting inclusion in schools. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 15(2), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782021000200023

México. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (1917). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/CPEUM.pdf

México. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2019). Ley General de Educación. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGE.pdf

México. Comisión Nacional para la Mejora Continua de la Educación. (2023). ¡Aprendamos en comunidad! Los ejes articuladores: Pensar desde nuestra diversidad (Fascículo 4). https://gestion.cte.sep.gob.mx/insumos/docs/2526_s2_t8_orgcompleta_insumo2.pdf

México. Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2020). Programa Sectorial de Educación 2020–2024. Gobierno de México. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/562380/Programa_Sectorial_de_Educaci_n_2020-2024.pdf

Muñoz-Mancilla, M., Solano-Olascoaga, E., & Belmonte-Segura, J. A. (2025). La investigación educativa como elemento constitutivo en la formación del docente de la Nueva Escuela Mexicana. Revista RedCA, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.36677/redca.v0i0.25879

Osuna-Lever, C., Medina-Barrios, M. E., & Diaz-López, K. M. (2024). La Nueva Escuela Mexicana: ¿Qué es? ¿Modelo educativo, política educativa o paradigma humanista? European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-723

Pinto García, G. M. (2023). Pensamiento complejo versus reforma educativa. Revista Vida, 5(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.36314/revistavida.v5i1.27

Rojas-Valladares, A. L., Domínguez-Urdanivia, Y., & Lafita-Frómeta, R. (2026). Diversidad, neurodivergencia e inclusión educativa: Aproximaciones teóricas desde la educación contemporánea. Sophia Editions.

Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2025). Programa Sectorial de Educación 2025–2030. Gobierno de México. https://www.planeacion.sep.gob.mx/medianoplazo.aspx

Siraj, I., Kingston, D., & Neilsen-Hewett, C. (2019). The role of professional development in improving quality and supporting child outcomes in early education and care. Pacific Early Childhood Education Research Association, 13(2), 49–68. https://www.pecerajournal.com/detail/30000779

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Aguilar-Hernández, M. G. (2026). Articulating axes and educational psychology: an intervention experience in a rural primary school in Hidalgo. Revista Mexicana De Investigación E Intervención Educativa, 5(4), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.62697/rmiie.v5i4.449